Woe to the teacher who has not embraced the internet

Last week the American businessman and financial education activist Robert Kiyosaki made a remark on Facebook that did not go well with many people who follow him. He said the ‘old idea of a teacher is obsolete; the internet and mobile devices are how people are learning’.

There were many individuals who insisted he was so wrong and that the statement undermined the work of teachers. They, like many of us who use public forums like this, were too quick to disagree without observing how Kiyosaki presented his claim. The key words there were ‘old idea of teacher’. With the opportunity to stay judgment until they have thought about the statement, many who disagreed may have a different take.

A few decades ago (and unfortunately in some places today), the transmission approach to teaching was the way schools operated. Teachers and prescribed text books were the deposits of knowledge and understanding. Students paid attention to learn as much as they could from the teacher. Once in a while, a prudent teacher realized the students also had something to offer and would incorporate discussions and feedback sessions. The students mostly took the teachers’ interpretation, who in turn may have gleaned it from a textbook author. In other words, one would learn what the teacher had learned.

It was important to learn what was expected because one would be tested at the end of a school term.

In many cases then (and today) what is not prescribed in the curriculum does not get taught.

The advent of information and communication technology and tools now gives the teacher and student new possibilities. The teacher may use podcasts with ideas and perspectives from other teachers to supplement their own effort. Almost all the knowledge the teacher previously brought to the class is now available for the student on the internet. The student only needs prudence to ask guidance on where to find reliable resources.

Robert Kiyosaki is not against teachers. He wants to point out that the internet and related technology tools are a big part of the teaching and learning process. Teachers who will not step up to the challenge of incorporating new technology tools in their practice are not only at a disadvantage, but dangerous for our schools. Although they can be great mentors and offer inspiration for young people, they offer an impoverished learning experience as they are likely to keep behind developments in their respective teaching areas.

Alvin Toffler has said that the illiterate of the twenty first century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn. 

Do you need that Master’s degree or experience?

You have hardly been a year out of university after a three or four-year Bachelor’s program. In these times I suspect most of the year has been spent enjoying your new found freedom from academic study, course tests and exams. After a few months of rest, the race to find work begins.  If you have found a job or started your own small business (as a sole service provider), you are now trying to stabilize in that new undertaking. In the case of those looking for employment, the search continues.

Hardly a year or two after leaving university there will be cries for you to acquire new qualifications. This is made to appear even more urgent for those who have no work or are in employment that they do not find fulfilling. You have been told that there are so many people ready to present a Bachelor’s certificate with their next job application. It will be at least a second class computer science, engineering, social science or physics degree. So yours is not that special.

It is true a Master’s degree may give you an edge at the job interview following elimination of many others. But this is not always the case.

I argue here that the best approach to the decision to advance to a Master’s degree is to consider what the extra credential will contribute to your productive ability. Furthermore, that the best measure of one’s productive ability is in what they can do with what they know (not just what they know). The best way to improve your productive ability is by obtaining work experience.

One is better off spending two or three years working full-time in a busy finance department of a large corporation than a year or so on a MBA program straight after a bachelor’s degree. If a Master’s degree does not offer you the possibility of working on real products or services for real clients (say with a semester of internship), you really have to think twice about spending money or time on it. Besides, working with real clients solving real problems gives you a wide range of experiences to take to graduate lecture discussions.

Should it matter if I’m offered a Masters scholarship? Yes. Time spent shuffling more pages in text books and solving structured problems keeps you behind colleagues who learn from performance challenges at the frontlines on the job.

Another way of looking at the decision is to consider what material rewards a promotion (resulting from a new Masters qualification) will bring or the intellectual rewards of advanced study in your discipline that gives you the capacity for deeper analysis of workplace problems.

I would definitely discourage young people fresh from university from advancing to Masters study just to fill time without employment.

***

A must share: Bob Parsons' 16 rules for business and life

Why you are still jobless

There are quite a number of writers on unemployment, but they mostly write from a narrow perspective. They assume they are writing for an audience of people seeking employment and not those who wish to start a business on their own or in partnership with others. They tell you that you are jobless because you do not know how to demonstrate what you know and can do, that your resume is disorganized and strewn with errors and you do not take networking seriously.

The result of drumming the wrong message without end is obscuring the option of using whatever skill young people have to enter the goods and services market.  There's another view.

Increasing competitiveness and technological advances have brought greater uncertainty in the way we work and the kind of work we do. That is something you can benefit from if you decide to change to an entrepreneurial mindset. It is a new way of thinking that one can benefit from the uncertainty.

The internet as a new medium of business has unbelievable potential to transform all aspects of life including prospects for those joining the workforce. So how will you get started? Here are a few things to take note of.

1.  Begin with a dream. We all have dreams and can have new dreams. The trouble is, when we encounter the slightest difficulty, there is a chance of a dream getting shelved and never revisited.
2. Seek out opportunities daily. Be alert and observant for changes in what is advertised in the papers, what people are talking about, trouble you may be having with appliances at home, etc. Read biographies of outstanding entrepreneurs, they are treasure houses.
3. Keep a record of your business ideas. Write a short description of the business idea (concept), find data that can help you establish whether the idea is feasible. This may include things like estimates of likely customers.
4. You need to examine who is already in the market with a similar service or product and how you can differentiate your offering from theirs.
5. Look out for particular skills or resources that you will need to thrive in the market. Establish ways of acquiring them. There are plenty of Teach Yourself resources online. 

The business opportunity should be something you love to do. That way you will go to work that is tough, but something you are committed to and find enjoyable.

There will be difficulties and rejection as you start out. Remember the way of beginning on your own is one of restlessness, persistence and perseverance. In the 1950s Ray Kroc, founder of McDonald’s approached relatives and friends for backing to start a new kind of hamburger restaurant. They discouraged him and told him to stick to selling milkshake blenders.

The 3M Corporation did not see potential in post-its (sticky notes) when Art Fry first brought the idea to management. He did not give up. Sticky notes are now a several hundred million business for 3M.

They did not give up. You too can succeed as an entrepreneur, initiator and developer and not just an employee.

*Listen to Thomas Friedman speak about changes in times of rapid technological advance

A generation without work!

A few days ago Pope Francis, enroute to the Catholic World Youth Day in Brazil, warned of a global crisis of unemployed young people.  He said we run the risk of losing an entire generation of young people to unemployment. The pope has probably had a look at the OECD 2013 youth employment projections where Spain and Greece are expected to reach about 28 percent (in both countries) in 2014.

(Courtesy of Freedigitialphotos.net)



The Economist also addressed this issue a couple months ago. It was reported that about 300 million 15-24 year olds around the world are without work. How did all this begin? What can we do about this crisis? Is it failure of individuals or system failure?

I think that a close look at the ways our schools and other institutions of learning operate and the ways employers (especially industry) seek out, recruit and retain workers may provide some clues. In this post, I will address the school system.

A fair portion of young people without work are those who may have left school early or had to leave prematurely. Others have in fact attended university or a college and still find themselves jobless.

A key problem may be the expectation that spending a few years at university or college equips one for the world of work. It turns out that a whole new mindset is now required to avoid the unemployment trap. Young people should be encouraged to reach an engagement level where they aim to do something with what they know other than simply passing knowledge tests and qualification certificates.

Tony Wagner, a Harvard professor has outlined the skills our schools and homes should seek to impart if young people are to innovate in an increasingly competitive world. They are: critical thinking and problem-solving, collaboration across networks, agility and adaptability, entrepreneurism, effective oral and written communication, how to access and analyze information and curiosity and imagination.

School experiences of young people should engage them in real work and prepare them to work, not to seek work. The management consultant Charles Handy has observed that the work of the future is portfolio work. A portfolio worker will not depend on an employer in the long term. They will only look for individuals who require their services and once they get a job done (probably short contract), they move on to the next task. We can already see the rise of freelance work with such sites as oDesk and Elance.

Finally it is time to reform our schools to reflect the new circumstances in which we live. We must prepare young people to perform in the real world and not simply remember facts here and there.

This, in my view, is one way to deal with the crisis of youth unemployment.

Asiana flight 214 crash and the problem of workplace training

On 6th July 2013, Asiana airlines Boeing 777 flight 214 from Incheon, South Korea to San Francisco in the US crashed during a landing attempt at San Francisco international airport. Most of the 307 people aboard were able to evacuate safely, 182 were injured, and two Chinese students and another unnamed minor died. As the US National Transportation Safety Board continues its investigation into the accident, the Board chairman has said preliminary work shows the aircraft was ‘too low, and too slow’ during its approach.

It has also been noted that the flying pilot Lee Gang-kuk, with about 10,000 hours of commercial pilot experience, had only about 35 hours operating the Boeing 777 and was flying the big jet into San Francisco for the first time.  The instructor pilot, Lee Jeong-min, an experienced pilot who has landed a this same aircraft at San Francisco airport 33 times was in the Boeing 777 trainer role for the first time. It is not clear what qualified Jeong-min as an instructor other than many years of experience.

Although I do not intend to speculate as to the cause of the crash, I would like to isolate the issue of workplace training and what organizations might learn. I will argue that length of work experience as basis for selection as an trainer/instructor is erroneous because knowing how to perform and teaching others to perform are different skills. The many years of experience that enable one acquire and master job skills do not naturally translate into ability to instruct novices.

To teach another individual how to perform in real life requires giving them a performance challenge. 

In the case of an aircraft pilot, this would be spending hours flying until a particular qualification threshold. I will use an example that many a reader will be more familiar with, driving a car. Knowing how to maintain control of a car on the road, monitoring speed and paying attention to road signs and other road users are crucial skills for all drivers. Knowing how to maintain speed in one’s car, for instance, is a different matter from teaching another individual to do the same. 
A good driving instructor knows how to maintain required speed and how to see others through performing the same task. They know crucial points when not to let one make mistakes with speed that can be fatal or at least criminal. They will watch out for what a novice driver may not see, like people who may suddenly choose to cross the road.

The same can be said of a good school teacher. A biologist, holder of a PhD, considering high school teaching may be asked to join a secondary school teacher preparation programme.  Those who would consider this uncalled for soon realize teaching is not just about content, it brings other matters to bear. The good teacher is called not only to try to engage the student to the point that they take responsibility for their own learning, but also pay attention to realize when the student is astray. The teacher is often called to admonish the student in a stern voice, but will also be found offering a sympathetic ear as a parent would do with their own child. 

In fact very experienced workers may be worse than less experienced colleagues because sometimes the former bring experience that is mis-educative to the job of training. Mis-educative work experience has the effect of arresting growth of further experience. For instance, one may propose the work methods they used through the many years of work as the only successful ones in spite of knowledge advancement.

A counter-argument may be advanced that experienced workers learn to train by training. This is only true to the extent that organizations acknowledge that training is not a role that one simply switches to given many years of job performance. Training others requires understanding how individuals learn, what may impede learning, what can go wrong (especially when errors may result in loss of life) and the circumstances under which the student should have lee-way to take risks and experiment.

The false assumption that experienced workers can seamlessly become trainers leads many organizations to expecting too much of experienced staff who do not know how to perform in a teaching role.  In a follow-up post, I will take up the issue of how employees in a bureaucratic work environment think and react in the face of emergencies.

*The author is a mechanic engineer with several years of experience in education.